Bu öğeden alıntı yapmak, öğeye bağlanmak için bu tanımlayıcıyı kullanınız: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31071
Başlık: Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
Yazarlar: Çelen, Sinan
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Anabilim Dalı.
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Cerrahi Patoloji Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0002-9790-7295
Kaygısız, Onur
Vuruşkan, Berna Aytaç
Vuruşkan, Hakan
L-9439-2019
AAM-9726-2020
AAH-9746-2021
16637252400
56527372000
6507328150
Anahtar kelimeler: Urology & nephrology
Laparoscopy
Nephrectomy
Suture techniques
Invasive partial nephrectomy
Retaining barbed suture
Warm ischemia time
Renal tumors
Outcomes
Renorrhaphy
Experience
Kidney
Yayın Tarihi: 24-Oca-2017
Yayıncı: Brazilian Social Urology
Atıf: Kaygısız, O. vd. (2017). ''Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy''. International Braz J Urol, 43(5), 863-870.
Özet: Objective: To comparatively evaluate the traditional interrupted knot-tying and running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl (R) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 62 consecutive patients undergoing LPN using traditional interrupted knot-tying suture renorrhaphy (Group 1; n= 31) or running suture technique renorrhaphy with 2-0 monofilament polyglecaprone (Monocryl (R), Ethicon) (Group 2; n= 31) from December 2011 to October 2015 at the University. All patients underwent LPN performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The demographic, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared between the groups, and the effect of both suture techniques on the warm ischemic time (WIT) and trifecta were evaluated. Results: The running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl (R) reduced WIT, estimated blood lost and length of hospitalization stay significantly without increasing postoperative complication rate during LPN in comparison with interrupted knot-tying suture. Conclusion: The renorrhaphy using the running suture with Monocryl (R) is an effective and safe technique with the advantage of shortening WIT even in more challenging and larger tumors during LPN.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0550
https://www.scielo.br/j/ibju/a/Pg73qbP9DfQjNwrYqp6xJ6B/?lang=en
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31071
ISSN: 1677-5538
1677-6119
Koleksiyonlarda Görünür:Scopus
Web of Science

Bu öğenin dosyaları:
Dosya Açıklama BoyutBiçim 
Kaygısız_vd_201.pdf154.26 kBAdobe PDFKüçük resim
Göster/Aç


Bu öğe kapsamında lisanslı Creative Commons License Creative Commons