Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31424
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEndres, Marcia-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-08T08:14:22Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-08T08:14:22Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-13-
dc.identifier.citationOrman, A. ve Endres, M. (2016). "Use of thermal imaging for identification of foot lesions in dairy cattle". Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science, 66(1), 1-7.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0906-4702-
dc.identifier.issn1651-1972-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2016.1179785-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09064702.2016.1179785-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/31424-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to investigate the use of infrared thermography (IRT) for detection of foot lesions in dairy cattle. Thermal images of the rear feet of 139 lactating dairy cows were taken with a thermal camera and evaluated using imaging software. Foot lesions identified in the study included white line disease (WLD), sole ulcer (SU) and digital dermatitis (DD). Temperatures at the coronary band (CBT) and the skin (ST) were recorded. Cows were scored for locomotion on a scale of 1-5 (1=normal and 5=severely lame). CBT was higher for all types of foot lesion (34.1 +/- 2.3, 33.8 +/- 1.6 and 33.1 +/- 1.6 degrees C for WLD, SU and DD, respectively) than for healthy (32.6 +/- 1.9 degrees C) feet. ST was higher only for WLD (33.2 +/- 2.0 degrees C) compared to healthy feet (31.5 +/- 1.7 degrees C). T (temperature difference between CBT and ST) was higher for SU (2.1 +/- 0.8 degrees C) than healthy feet (1.1 +/- 0.9 degrees C). Locomotion scores (LSs) were similar between healthy cows (2.2 +/- 0.7) and DD (2.4 +/- 0.7) but greater for SU and WLD cows (3.0 +/- 0.9, 3.0 +/- 0.8) than healthy cows. The threshold values established for CBT and ST were 33.5 degrees C (sensitivity=77.8%, specificity=65.2%) and 33.7 degrees C (sensitivity=44.4%, specificity=92.9%) for SU, and 34.4(o)C (sensitivity=28.1%, specificity=88.6%) and 31.8 degrees C (sensitivity=60.7%, specificity=55.4%) for overall lesion, respectively. These results indicate that IRT can be a useful tool for detection of SU, but not WLD and DD. In addition, CBT and T were the best indicators for the detection of foot lesions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAgricultureen_US
dc.subjectLamenessen_US
dc.subjectThermographyen_US
dc.subjectFoot lesionsen_US
dc.subjectDairy cattleen_US
dc.subjectInfrared thermographyen_US
dc.subjectHoof lesionsen_US
dc.subjectClinical lamenessen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectPathologiesen_US
dc.subjectCowsen_US
dc.titleUse of thermal imaging for identification of foot lesions in dairy cattleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000381583200001tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84969262762tr_TR
dc.relation.tubitakTÜBİTAK-BIDEBtr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Veteriner Fakültesi/Zootekni Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9138-4422tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage1tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage7tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume66tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue1tr_TR
dc.relation.journalActa Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorOrman, Abdulkadir-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-9134-2021tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışıtr_TR
dc.subject.wosAgriculture, dairy & animal scienceen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid24335834100tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusDigital Dermatitis; Cattle; Dairy Cowsen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.