Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31424
Title: Use of thermal imaging for identification of foot lesions in dairy cattle
Authors: Endres, Marcia
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Veteriner Fakültesi/Zootekni Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0001-9138-4422
Orman, Abdulkadir
AAG-9134-2021
24335834100
Keywords: Agriculture
Lameness
Thermography
Foot lesions
Dairy cattle
Infrared thermography
Hoof lesions
Clinical lameness
Prevalence
Pathologies
Cows
Issue Date: 13-Apr-2016
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Citation: Orman, A. ve Endres, M. (2016). "Use of thermal imaging for identification of foot lesions in dairy cattle". Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science, 66(1), 1-7.
Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate the use of infrared thermography (IRT) for detection of foot lesions in dairy cattle. Thermal images of the rear feet of 139 lactating dairy cows were taken with a thermal camera and evaluated using imaging software. Foot lesions identified in the study included white line disease (WLD), sole ulcer (SU) and digital dermatitis (DD). Temperatures at the coronary band (CBT) and the skin (ST) were recorded. Cows were scored for locomotion on a scale of 1-5 (1=normal and 5=severely lame). CBT was higher for all types of foot lesion (34.1 +/- 2.3, 33.8 +/- 1.6 and 33.1 +/- 1.6 degrees C for WLD, SU and DD, respectively) than for healthy (32.6 +/- 1.9 degrees C) feet. ST was higher only for WLD (33.2 +/- 2.0 degrees C) compared to healthy feet (31.5 +/- 1.7 degrees C). T (temperature difference between CBT and ST) was higher for SU (2.1 +/- 0.8 degrees C) than healthy feet (1.1 +/- 0.9 degrees C). Locomotion scores (LSs) were similar between healthy cows (2.2 +/- 0.7) and DD (2.4 +/- 0.7) but greater for SU and WLD cows (3.0 +/- 0.9, 3.0 +/- 0.8) than healthy cows. The threshold values established for CBT and ST were 33.5 degrees C (sensitivity=77.8%, specificity=65.2%) and 33.7 degrees C (sensitivity=44.4%, specificity=92.9%) for SU, and 34.4(o)C (sensitivity=28.1%, specificity=88.6%) and 31.8 degrees C (sensitivity=60.7%, specificity=55.4%) for overall lesion, respectively. These results indicate that IRT can be a useful tool for detection of SU, but not WLD and DD. In addition, CBT and T were the best indicators for the detection of foot lesions.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2016.1179785
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09064702.2016.1179785
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31424
ISSN: 0906-4702
1651-1972
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.