Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/33001
Title: | Performance analysis of axial and reverse flow cyclone separators |
Authors: | Sakin, Ali Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Mühendislik Fakültesi/Makina Mühendisliği/Termodinamik Bölümü. 0000-0002-7442-2746 Karagöz, Irfan Avcı, Atakan AAB-9388-2020 56785809700 7004169972 |
Keywords: | Two phase flow Separation efficiency Pressure drop Cfd Dimensions Field Energy & Fuels Engineering Axial flow Computational fluid dynamics Cyclone separators Drops Efficiency Lagrange multipliers Pressure drop Reynolds number Velocity Wall function Computational results Fractional efficiencies Geometric configurations La-grangian approaches Performance characteristics Reverse-flow operation Reynolds stress models Separation efficiency Two phase flow |
Issue Date: | Oct-2019 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Citation: | Sakin, A. vd. (2019). ''Performance analysis of axial and reverse flow cyclone separators''. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 144. |
Abstract: | Performance characteristics of a novel cyclone with tangential inlet were presented in axial and reverse flow operation modes. 3-D and unsteady governing equations were used for the numerical solution of the two-phase turbulent flow in the cyclone separator. The Eulerian approach was used to solve the flow field, and the Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) with the scalable wall function was employed for the numerical study. The Lagrangian approach with the Discrete Phase Model was used to calculate the discrete phase by releasing particles from the inlet surface. CFD calculations were run for different geometric configurations to analyze the performance of the cyclones regarding pressure drop, cut-off diameter, and fractional efficiency. Axial and tangential velocity profiles are presented at the defined sections. The computational results of pressure drop, velocity field, and separation efficiency were also compared for the axial and reverse flow cyclones at the same flow rate. The results show that pressure drop and collection efficiency in reverse flow mode are higher than that of the axial flow operation. However, axial flow cyclones seem to be more efficient for small particles comparing to reverse flow cyclones. |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.107630 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255270118313709 http://hdl.handle.net/11452/33001 |
ISSN: | 0255-2701 1873-3204 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.