Bu öğeden alıntı yapmak, öğeye bağlanmak için bu tanımlayıcıyı kullanınız: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34413
Başlık: Efficacy of diclofenac & thiocolchioside gel phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on acute low back pain; a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical study
Yazarlar: Aksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu
Özturk, Esra Kösegil
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı.
Altan, Lale
AAH-1652-2021
6603281363
Anahtar kelimeler: Ultrasound treatment
Phonophoresis
Acute low back pain
Diclofenac
Thiocolchioside
Single-blind
Muscle
Safety
Mhz
Acoustic fields
Drug products
Ultrasonics
Diclofenac
Low back pain
Thiocolchioside
Ultrasound treatments
Patient treatment
Acoustics
Radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Yayın Tarihi: Oca-2019
Yayıncı: Elsevier
Atıf: Aksoy, M. K. vd. (2019). "Efficacy of diclofenac & thiocolchioside gel phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on acute low back pain; a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical study". Ultrasonics, 91, 201-205.
Özet: Purpose: To investigate the effect of Phonophoresis (PP) with the combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID's) and myorelaxant versus routine Ultrasound (US) treatment with non-therapeutic gel on the patients with acute low back pain (ABP). Methods: Sixty patients with ABP were randomly assigned into 2 groups. In Group 1 (n = 30) US was applied using diclofenac + Thiocolchicoside gel for 10 min and for a total of 10 sessions. In Group 2 (n = 30) the same US protocol was applied with the same setting and timing with Group 1 using US gel that does not contain any pharmaceutical ingredient. Evaluation parameters were Visual numeric scale (VNS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Shober test. Results: Comparison of the results obtained from the two groups before treatment and at second (W2) and sixth weeks (W6) posttreatment showed significant improvement in all parameters in both groups (p < 0.05). Comparison of the groups showed significantly superior improvement in Group 1 for ODI while there was no difference in other parameters at W2. At W6, there was significantly superior improvement in all parameters (p < 0.05) except for Shober test in Group1. Conclusion: Our results showed that PP treatment is superior than conventional US therapy at short term in ABP patients.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2018.08.008
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041624X17309988?via%3Dihub
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34413
ISSN: 0041-624X
1874-9968
Koleksiyonlarda Görünür:PubMed
Scopus
Web of Science

Bu öğenin dosyaları:
Bu öğeyle ilişkili dosya bulunmamaktadır.


DSpace'deki bütün öğeler, aksi belirtilmedikçe, tüm hakları saklı tutulmak şartıyla telif hakkı ile korunmaktadır.