Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34413
Title: | Efficacy of diclofenac & thiocolchioside gel phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on acute low back pain; a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical study |
Authors: | Aksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu Özturk, Esra Kösegil Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı. Altan, Lale AAH-1652-2021 6603281363 |
Keywords: | Ultrasound treatment Phonophoresis Acute low back pain Diclofenac Thiocolchioside Single-blind Muscle Safety Mhz Acoustic fields Drug products Ultrasonics Diclofenac Low back pain Thiocolchioside Ultrasound treatments Patient treatment Acoustics Radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging |
Issue Date: | Jan-2019 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Citation: | Aksoy, M. K. vd. (2019). "Efficacy of diclofenac & thiocolchioside gel phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on acute low back pain; a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical study". Ultrasonics, 91, 201-205. |
Abstract: | Purpose: To investigate the effect of Phonophoresis (PP) with the combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID's) and myorelaxant versus routine Ultrasound (US) treatment with non-therapeutic gel on the patients with acute low back pain (ABP). Methods: Sixty patients with ABP were randomly assigned into 2 groups. In Group 1 (n = 30) US was applied using diclofenac + Thiocolchicoside gel for 10 min and for a total of 10 sessions. In Group 2 (n = 30) the same US protocol was applied with the same setting and timing with Group 1 using US gel that does not contain any pharmaceutical ingredient. Evaluation parameters were Visual numeric scale (VNS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Shober test. Results: Comparison of the results obtained from the two groups before treatment and at second (W2) and sixth weeks (W6) posttreatment showed significant improvement in all parameters in both groups (p < 0.05). Comparison of the groups showed significantly superior improvement in Group 1 for ODI while there was no difference in other parameters at W2. At W6, there was significantly superior improvement in all parameters (p < 0.05) except for Shober test in Group1. Conclusion: Our results showed that PP treatment is superior than conventional US therapy at short term in ABP patients. |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2018.08.008 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041624X17309988?via%3Dihub http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34413 |
ISSN: | 0041-624X 1874-9968 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.