Bu öğeden alıntı yapmak, öğeye bağlanmak için bu tanımlayıcıyı kullanınız: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34656
Başlık: Turkish dermatologists' approach for chronic spontaneous urticaria: A questionnaire based study
Yazarlar: Kocatürk, Emek
Pırıl, Etikan
Oktay, Taşkapan
Nilgün, Atakan
Teoman, Erdem
Serap, Utaş
Ekin, Savk
Rafet, Koca
Şebnem, Aktan
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Dermatoloji ve Zührevi Hastalıklar Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0002-0144-3263
Emel, Bülbül Başkan
AAH-1388-2021
57196063450
Anahtar kelimeler: Dermatology
Urticaria
Dermatologists
Therapeutics
Diagnosis
Guideline
Chronic idiopathic urticaria
Management
Diagnosis
Omalizumab
Guideline
Life
Yayın Tarihi: 9-Eyl-2017
Yayıncı: Wolters Luver Medknow Publications
Atıf: Kocatürk, E. vd. (2018). ''Turkish dermatologists' approach for chronic spontaneous urticaria: A questionnaire based study''. Dermatologica Sinica, 36(2), 70-74.
Özet: Background/Objectives: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common skin disorder which represents a challenge both for the patients and physicians. Guidelines and treatment algorithms have been created to help physicians to ease management. Our aim was to determine Turkish dermatologists' approach to CSU with regard to treatment, search for causative factors and use of instruments to assess the quality of life and severity of the disease. Methods: This was a cross-sectional methodological study which was performed by delivery of a questionnaire including ten questions about the management of CSU. Results: Analyses of 314 questionnaires revealed that the most common first-line treatments were non-sedating antihistamines in standard doses (65.6%), while second-line treatment was updosing antihistamines (59.9%) followed by addition of sedative-antihistamines (26.4%) and systemic steroids (19.1%). Third-line treatment option was omalizumab in 35% followed by systemic steroids. Twenty-two percent of the dermatologists referred the patients to a center experienced in urticaria. Most of them were performing laboratory testing for underlying causes including thyroid function tests, C-reactive protein, thyroid auto-antibodies, stool analyses, infection markers. Urticaria activity score and chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire were used by 30 and 13%, respectively, while 56% were using none of the instruments. Conclusion: Our study showed that the therapeutic management of Turkish dermatologists was parallel to the European Urticaria Guidelines. The high utility of omalizumab as a third line regimen improved patient care. Nevertheless there is a need for centers experienced in urticaria to refer anti-histamineresistant patients where third-line treatment options can not be implemented.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsi.2017.09.002
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1027811717300903
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34656
ISSN: 1027-8117
2223-330X
Koleksiyonlarda Görünür:Scopus
Web of Science

Bu öğenin dosyaları:
Dosya Açıklama BoyutBiçim 
Kocatürk_vd_2018.pdf185.94 kBAdobe PDFKüçük resim
Göster/Aç


Bu öğe kapsamında lisanslı Creative Commons License Creative Commons