Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/26140
Title: Genotype x nvironment interaction and stability analysis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Authors: Üstün, Ali
Gül, İsmail
Anlarsal, Emin
Tekeli, Ali Servet
Nizam, İlker
Avcıoğlu, Rıza
Geren, Hakan
Çakmakçı, Sadık
Aydınoğlu, Bilal
Yücel, Celal
Avcı, Mustafa
Acar, Zeki
Ayan, İlknur
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü.
Açıkgöz, Esvet
Uzun, Ayşen
Bilgili, Uğur
Sıncık, Mehmet
Yavuz, Mine
AAH-1811-2021
AAH-1539-2021
AAG-7431-2021
6602817346
13004441000
6506803244
23989507900
26532114800
Keywords: Adaptation
Cluster
Leafed and semi-leafless peas
Mediterranean conditions
Stability
Cultivars
Mixtures
Biomass
Growth
Agriculture
Pisum sativum
Issue Date: Mar-2009
Publisher: Spanish Natl Inst Agricultural & Food Research & Technolo
Citation: Açıkgöz, E. vd. (2009). "Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.)". Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(1), 96-106.
Abstract: The objectives of this study were to evaluate dry matter (DM) yield and seed yield of six leafed and semi-leafless pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes, and to compare them for these traits. Evaluation of genotype x environment (G x E) interaction, stability and cluster analysis were also carried out at eight diverse locations with typical Mediterranean and Mediterranean-type climate during the 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 growing seasons. Significant differences were found among the pea genotypes for DM and seed yield on individual years and combined over years, and in all locations. All interactions which related to G x E interaction showed significance (P>0.001) for DM and seed yield. The highest yield (4789 kg ha(-1)) was obtained from the leafed genotype 'Urunlu'. However, stability analysis indicated that for DM yield, the leafed genotypes 'Golyazi' and 'Urunlu' should be grown in low yielding and high yielding environments, respectively. Cluster analysis, based on grouping locations, showed that P101 was the preferred variety in low yielding environments, and P98, in high yielding ones. It was suggested that the use of both stability and cluster analyses might give better results. Comparison of cluster and stability analyses showed that the stability analysis fails to recommend cultivars to different regions where yield potential showed significant differences. It seems, however, that cluster analysis could be a powerful tool to examine G x E interaction. If the number of environments was sufficient, a separate stability analysis could be run in each cluster.
URI: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2009071-402
https://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/402
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/26140
ISSN: 1695-971X
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Açıkgöz_vd_2009.pdf196.96 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons