Bu öğeden alıntı yapmak, öğeye bağlanmak için bu tanımlayıcıyı kullanınız:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/26140
Başlık: | Genotype x nvironment interaction and stability analysis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) |
Yazarlar: | Üstün, Ali Gül, İsmail Anlarsal, Emin Tekeli, Ali Servet Nizam, İlker Avcıoğlu, Rıza Geren, Hakan Çakmakçı, Sadık Aydınoğlu, Bilal Yücel, Celal Avcı, Mustafa Acar, Zeki Ayan, İlknur Uludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü. Açıkgöz, Esvet Uzun, Ayşen Bilgili, Uğur Sıncık, Mehmet Yavuz, Mine AAH-1811-2021 AAH-1539-2021 AAG-7431-2021 6602817346 13004441000 6506803244 23989507900 26532114800 |
Anahtar kelimeler: | Adaptation Cluster Leafed and semi-leafless peas Mediterranean conditions Stability Cultivars Mixtures Biomass Growth Agriculture Pisum sativum |
Yayın Tarihi: | Mar-2009 |
Yayıncı: | Spanish Natl Inst Agricultural & Food Research & Technolo |
Atıf: | Açıkgöz, E. vd. (2009). "Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.)". Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(1), 96-106. |
Özet: | The objectives of this study were to evaluate dry matter (DM) yield and seed yield of six leafed and semi-leafless pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes, and to compare them for these traits. Evaluation of genotype x environment (G x E) interaction, stability and cluster analysis were also carried out at eight diverse locations with typical Mediterranean and Mediterranean-type climate during the 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 growing seasons. Significant differences were found among the pea genotypes for DM and seed yield on individual years and combined over years, and in all locations. All interactions which related to G x E interaction showed significance (P>0.001) for DM and seed yield. The highest yield (4789 kg ha(-1)) was obtained from the leafed genotype 'Urunlu'. However, stability analysis indicated that for DM yield, the leafed genotypes 'Golyazi' and 'Urunlu' should be grown in low yielding and high yielding environments, respectively. Cluster analysis, based on grouping locations, showed that P101 was the preferred variety in low yielding environments, and P98, in high yielding ones. It was suggested that the use of both stability and cluster analyses might give better results. Comparison of cluster and stability analyses showed that the stability analysis fails to recommend cultivars to different regions where yield potential showed significant differences. It seems, however, that cluster analysis could be a powerful tool to examine G x E interaction. If the number of environments was sufficient, a separate stability analysis could be run in each cluster. |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2009071-402 https://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/402 http://hdl.handle.net/11452/26140 |
ISSN: | 1695-971X |
Koleksiyonlarda Görünür: | Scopus Web of Science |
Bu öğenin dosyaları:
Dosya | Açıklama | Boyut | Biçim | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Açıkgöz_vd_2009.pdf | 196.96 kB | Adobe PDF | Göster/Aç |
Bu öğe kapsamında lisanslı Creative Commons License