Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31071
Title: Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
Authors: Çelen, Sinan
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Anabilim Dalı.
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Cerrahi Patoloji Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0002-9790-7295
Kaygısız, Onur
Vuruşkan, Berna Aytaç
Vuruşkan, Hakan
L-9439-2019
AAM-9726-2020
AAH-9746-2021
16637252400
56527372000
6507328150
Keywords: Urology & nephrology
Laparoscopy
Nephrectomy
Suture techniques
Invasive partial nephrectomy
Retaining barbed suture
Warm ischemia time
Renal tumors
Outcomes
Renorrhaphy
Experience
Kidney
Issue Date: 24-Jan-2017
Publisher: Brazilian Social Urology
Citation: Kaygısız, O. vd. (2017). ''Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy''. International Braz J Urol, 43(5), 863-870.
Abstract: Objective: To comparatively evaluate the traditional interrupted knot-tying and running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl (R) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 62 consecutive patients undergoing LPN using traditional interrupted knot-tying suture renorrhaphy (Group 1; n= 31) or running suture technique renorrhaphy with 2-0 monofilament polyglecaprone (Monocryl (R), Ethicon) (Group 2; n= 31) from December 2011 to October 2015 at the University. All patients underwent LPN performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The demographic, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared between the groups, and the effect of both suture techniques on the warm ischemic time (WIT) and trifecta were evaluated. Results: The running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl (R) reduced WIT, estimated blood lost and length of hospitalization stay significantly without increasing postoperative complication rate during LPN in comparison with interrupted knot-tying suture. Conclusion: The renorrhaphy using the running suture with Monocryl (R) is an effective and safe technique with the advantage of shortening WIT even in more challenging and larger tumors during LPN.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0550
https://www.scielo.br/j/ibju/a/Pg73qbP9DfQjNwrYqp6xJ6B/?lang=en
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31071
ISSN: 1677-5538
1677-6119
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kaygısız_vd_201.pdf154.26 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons